Ergebnis 1 bis 4 von 4

Thema: Likely Humanitarian Scenarios In Case of US-Led War against Iraq

  1. #1
    Likely Humanitarian Scenarios In Case of US-Led War against Iraq
    Gast

    Likely Humanitarian Scenarios In Case of US-Led War against Iraq


    Likely

    Humanitarian Scenarios

    In Case of

    US-Led War

    against Iraq

    U.N. Classified Draft of December 10th, 2002

    Ebooked by wintermute_1980

    2

    3

    Table of Contents

    Notes for Readers

    Notes for Editors

    Transcript of 'Likely Humanitarian Scenarios'

    Introduction

    Need Assessment

    Summary of scenarios

    Socio-economic recovery of Iraq

    Debt protection

    United Nations access to programme resources

    Relations with and role of the military

    Other matters which require early guidance

    Appendix

    Facsimile Files of 'Likely Humanitarian Scenarios'

    Introduction

    Need Assessment

    Summary of scenarios

    Socio-economic recovery of Iraq

    Debt protection

    United Nations access to programme resources

    Relations with and role of the military

    Other matters which require early guidance

    Appendix

    .................................................. ....................page 5

    .................................................. ......................page 7

    .................................................. ......................page 9

    .................................................. ...........page 12

    .................................................. ....page 16

    .....................................page 17

    .................................................. ...............page 18

    ..............page 19

    .............................page 19

    ....................page 20

    .................................................. ........................page 21

    .................................................. ....................page 23

    .................................................. ...........page 25

    .................................................. ....page 29

    .....................................page 30

    .................................................. ...............page 31

    ..............page 32

    .............................page 32

    ....................page 33

    .................................................. ........................page 34

    4

    5

    I. Notes for readers

    This "strictly confidential" UN document, dated 10 December 2002,

    examines "Likely Humanitarian Scenarios" in the event of a war of US-led

    forces against (and inside) Iraq. It was written to assist with UN

    contingency planning for safeguarding the wellbeing of a population most

    of whom the document acknowledges are "highly dependent" upon a

    Government ration for their basic needs. Since the purpose of such a war

    would be to oust the current Iraqi government, this would eliminate the

    fulfilment of such basic needs as food, potable water and health care for

    most of the population at least in Central and Southern Iraq.

    The document focuses on the likely outcomes for the infrastructure, the

    economy and Iraqi civilians, in the event of a range of anticipated military

    scenarios. It includes the following estimates concerning the humanitarian

    effects of military action:

    § Serious degradation of the electricity sector1, with the knock-on effect

    that all sectors of the infrastructure, primarily in population centers -

    including health, water and sanitation - will have reduced capacity and

    thus insufficient performance (paragraph 5a). The extensive

    curtailment of access to potable water is anticipated (paragraph 15),

    so that an estimated "39% of the population will need to be provided

    with potable water" in the short term (paragraph 28).

    § In planning for the numbers that will require medical treatment, "as

    many as 500,000 could require treatment to a greater or lesser degree

    as a result of direct or indirect injuries" (paragraph 23). A footnote

    bases this claim on World Health Organisation estimates of 100,000

    direct casualties, and 400,000 indirect casualties. The high number of

    indirect casualties from breakdown of the basic sanitary infrastructure

    may be partially because "the outbreak of diseases in epidemic if not

    pandemic proportions is very likely." (paragraph 25). Furthermore, it

    indicates existing shortages of some medical items, "rendering the

    existing stocks inadequate" for war-increased demand (paragraph 22),

    and exacerbated by the "likely absence of a functioning primary health

    care system in a post-conflict situation" (paragraph 24).

    § "It is estimated that the nutritional status of some 3.03 million persons

    countrywide will be dire and they will require therapeutic feeding. This

    consists of 2.03 million severely and moderately malnourished children

    under five and one million pregnant and lactating women." (paragraph

    27). A footnote identifies this as a United Nations Children's Fund

    (UNICEF) estimate.

    § "It is estimated that there will eventually be some 900,000 Iraqi

    refugees requiring assistance, of which 100,000 will be in need of

    1 Including purpose-built BLU-114/B bombs and possibly AGM-154 missiles

    http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/dumb/blu-114.htm as well as

    ‘Kit-2’ Tomahawk cruise missiles http://www.cdiss.org/tabtechs.htm, as

    pioneered in the 1991 war against Iraq.

    6

    § immediate assistance." (paragraph 35). A footnote identifies this as an

    estimate of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees

    (UNHCR). An estimated 2 million people will require some assistance

    with shelter (paragraph 33), while for 130,000 existing refugees in

    Iraq "it is probable that UNHCR will initially be unable to provide the

    support required" (paragraph 36).

    The text focuses on humanitarian needs and coping mechanisms. As part

    of its analysis, the document presents the data of UN agencies on the

    existing humanitarian situation inside Iraq. The context is the

    humanitarian situation after 12 years of military and 'dual-use good'2

    sanctions: a damaged economy and infrastructure, and almost total

    dependence on the Iraqi government for basic needs provision. The

    document estimates that 16 million Iraqis3 are completely dependent on

    the monthly food rations, in that "they have no other means with which to

    provide for other essential requirements" (paragraph 11). Chronic

    unemployment since 1991 has resulted in a situation in which "all except

    the most privileged have completely exhausted their cash assets and have

    also in most cases disposed of their material assets". For these reasons,

    the document also rejects comparisons with humanitarian outcomes of

    both the 2001 Afghanistan and 1991 Gulf conflicts (paragraphs 2, 4 and

    11).

    This file presents an analysis of requirements for both emergency and

    protracted scenarios. Funding issues and relations with the military are

    also discussed.

    The existence of this document was first reported in THE TIMES (London)

    on 23 December 2002, in an article entitled "UN chief issues secret orders

    for war in Iraq"4. However, this is the first time that the document has

    been made publicly accessible formatted for print-out.

    Please note this UN document is a draft. Estimates and other content may

    have since been revised. Additionally, several paragraphs and tables have

    been deleted at the request of the individual who released the document,

    including the entirety of page 35.

    The UN document was obtained via Nathaniel Hurd, Consultant on UN Iraq

    policy for the Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) UN Office and the

    Cambridge NGO CASI (see next page).

    2 Including all educational goods, most medical supplies, construction materials

    etc.

    3 60% of the population, not taking into account that large areas are under

    Kurdish control and thus a different matter.

    4 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...522510,00.html

    5 These deleted parts seem to outline, amongst other things, the 'security

    phases' referenced to in paragraph 56a and b.

    7

    II. Notes for editors:

    1) A scan of the original UN document (minus deletions) was made

    available at http://www.casi.org.uk/info/undocs/war021210.pdf, by

    the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq (CASI) 6, a Cambridge-based

    NGO which exists to raise awareness to the effects of sanctions on

    Iraq, and campaigns on humanitarian grounds for the lifting of nonmilitary

    sanctions.

    CASI does not support or have ties to the government of Iraq.

    The document had been acquired by CASI via Nathaniel Hurd7,

    Consultant on UN Iraq policy for the Mennonite Central Committee

    (MCC) UN Office. His8 and CASI's9 notes also served as basis for the

    introductory notes.

    2) Please note this UN document is a draft. Estimates and other content

    may have since been revised. Additionally, several paragraphs and

    tables have been deleted at the request of the individual who released

    the document, including the entirety of page 3.

    3) Please note that the document text is the CASI transcription of the

    original, and as such may contain errors introduced in the transcription

    process. To be sure of an accurate text, please compare to the original

    document provided as the facsimiles.

    4) CASI can be contacted via its website6 or by email on info@casi.org.uk.

    6 http://www.casi.org.uk

    7 nathaniel_hurd@hotmail.com

    8 http://www.casi.org.uk/info/undocs/war021210notes.html

    9 http://www.casi.org.uk/pr/pr030107undoc.html

    8

    9

    STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL

    10 December 2002

    LIKELY HUMANITARIAN SCENARIOS

    Introduction

    1. In presenting the present paper it is not presumed that wa[r] is not inevitable. However,

    for planning purposes, and as requested, certain assumptions are made in preparing for

    eventualities should hostilities occur. Unlike the progression of the military intervention in

    1991, a future confrontation is expected to develop beyond the preparatory, and relatively

    short, aerial bombardment of infrastructure, towns, and cities into potentially a large scale and

    protracted ground offensive, supported by aerial and conventional bombardment. The

    resultant devastation would undoubtedly be great. Initially, access to those in need would

    either be denied by one or other of the protagonists or severely hampered by security or safety

    concerns. Additionally, logistics, particularly the ability to move with any degree of freedom,

    will be a major constraint.

    2. There is a temptation is some quarters to equate the situation following any future military

    intervention in Iraq, with the population's ability to cope in 1991. Such comparisons are not

    valid, as the sustentative majority of the population, immediately prior to the events of 1991,

    were in full employment and had cash and material assets available to them to cope with the

    crisis. Aside from now not having been gainfully employed for some time, during the

    intervening period, all except the most privileged have completely exhausted their cash assets

    and have also in most cases disposed of their material assets. Accordingly, the bulk of the

    population is now totally dependent on the Government of Iraq for a majority, if not all, of

    their basic needs and, unlike the situation in 1991, they have no way of coping if they cannot

    access them: the sanctions regime, if anything, has served to increase dependence on the

    Government as almost the sole provider.

    3. There is also the temptation to draw comparisons between the situation in Afghanistan

    following the military intervention of 2001/2002 and the situation, which is likely to be facing

    Iraq in a post conflict scenario. Aside from having similar population figures – almost 26

    million in Afghanistan and approximately 26.5 million in Iraq – such comparisons are simply

    invalid. The population in Afghanistan is predominantly rural. Furthermore, over time the

    Afghan population has become used to being less reliant on the state – there has been no allencompassing

    "state machinery" in Afghanistan – and the Afghans have therefore been more

    self-reliant. The situation in Iraq, however, has been the reverse: a relatively urbanized

    population, with the state providing the basic needs of the population as a matter of

    Government policy. As households have generally become poorer during the course of the

    sanctions regime, the Iraqi people have become even more reliant on the state to meet their

    basic needs.

    4. Furthermore, notwithstanding the sanctions regime, the Iraqi people are relatively

    sophisticated in their needs. Quite simply, the Iraqi society has become accustomed to a

    reasonable standard of services that are provided under the auspices of, or directly by, the

    state. However, with the foreseen degradation of infrastructure in general, and electricity in

    particular, on which the provision of the services concerned are heavily dependent on, many

    of these services are not likely to be available following a conflict.

    5. Accordingly, in assessing the likely humanitarian needs of the Iraqi people during the post

    conflict situation, the following assumptions would appear to be justified:

    10

    a) The electricity network will be seriously degraded because of damage to generating

    plants and the transmission and distribution networks. The damage to the electricity

    network will also result in collateral reductions in capacity in all sectors, particularly

    water and sanitation as well as health.

    b) The port of Umm Qasr will be largely unavailable as it will in all probability either

    be blockaded or suffer significant damage in the preliminary stages of any hostilities.

    Accordingly, it cannot reliably be predicted whether any capacity in the port will be

    available for humanitarian activities.

    c) The railway system will be significantly degraded as a result of damage to bridges,

    culverts and tracks.

    d) Road transportation vehicles and depots will suffer considerable damage and, as a

    consequence, there will be a significant degradation of the already poor transportation

    system.

    e) As Iraq is trisected by two major river systems which flow north-south and as most, if

    not all, major bridges will be destroyed or damaged, east-west movement of goods

    and people will be on a restricted basis. Furthermore, the rivers are of such a depth

    that fording is not possible and there is an almost total absence of lighters, ferries and

    the like.

    f) Damage to the electricity network will result in collateral reductions in capacity in all

    sectors, particularly water and sanitation as well as health.

    g) There could be significant damage to existing Government stocks of all commodities.

    h) The production and export of crude oil as well as production of petroleum products

    mostly for domestic consumption will have ceased, and the facilities holding existing

    reserve stocks will have been significantly damaged.

    11

    [page 3 withheld]

    12

    Needs Assessment

    11. As stated earlier in paragraph 2 above, there are some 60 per cent of the population – 16

    million people – highly dependent on the monthly "food basket" – they "consume" all the

    commodities provided, (by consuming or selling part to mitigate other needs), as they have no

    other means with which to provide for other essential requirements.

    12. In the three northern governorates, there will be an immediate need to establish an

    alternative source of supply for the items provided in the "food basket", for the entire

    population of about over 3.7 million people: the population in the three northern governorates.

    Given the probable course of the conflict, the current established delivery system of

    foodstuffs and necessities from Mosul and Kirkuk is not likely to be available from the outset

    of hostilities because of their location, south of the dividing line. Of the total population in the

    three northern governorates, approximately 2.2 million will be highly dependent on the food

    distribution system.

    13. The loss of electricity to Dahuk, while having major consequences at the household

    level, should not immediately impact the provision of humanitarian services. Assuming the

    level of conflict is low throughout the three northern governorates, and based on the recent

    UN observations of small and medium sized electricity generators in those governorates, and

    a 29 MW generators in each of the three governorates, there appears to be sufficient capacity

    available, supplemented by the delivery pipeline of additional generators under already

    approved contracts to provide backup electricity supply to "emergency" facilities. This is a

    factor that will be taken into account when determining the final position of the small and

    medium generators already made available under the humanitarian programme.

    14. It will be necessary, however, to establish a supply line for fuel. It is estimated that in the

    three northern governorates the monthly requirement of fuel1 is approximately 30,000,000 lts.

    of gasoline, approximately 30,000,000 lts of diesel, about 40,000,000 lts of Kerosene, and

    about 10,000 tons of cooking gas. However, there is very limited storage capacity in the three

    northern governorates and the available refining capacity would be insignificant.

    15. Elsewhere in the country, particularly in the "Centre Region" and "Baghdad", given the

    likely intensity of any conflict, particularly in the preparatory and initial stages, it is probably

    that the infrastructure will be severely damaged as a result of aerial and ground bombardment

    or by the withdrawing Government forces. Infrastructure, particularly that relating to oil

    production; transport,.i.e., vehicles and depots; ports; railways; roads and bridges; and

    electricity production can be expected to be especially hard hit. As a result, the availability of

    potable water is likely to be curtailed extensively. The infrastructure, including private and

    commercial vehicles, which are still available, may well be allocated by the Government to

    other than humanitarian purposes. In any event, the logistical aspects of the humanitarian

    response will require a substantial amount of specialized assets and the absence of such assets

    in sufficient quantities will probably be a major constraint, until some degree of rehabilitation,

    albeit of a temporary nature, occurs. Fuel, in the worst case, may have to be imported.

    1 Based on the latest estimates by the United Nations personnel operating in the three northern

    governorates.

    13

    16. However, it is improbable that the level of services being provided by the Government

    would cease simultaneously for the total population. Rather, it is probable that there would be

    a progressive run down and eventual cessation of distribution of commodities and the

    provision of services. If one presumes that potential military intervention will roll

    simultaneously from the south and the north, the peripheral governorates of Basrah, Maysan,

    Thi Qar, Muthana, Najaf, Kerbala, and Qadisiyah in the south and Ninewa and Tameem in the

    north will be immediately affected.

    17. The population in immediate need of humanitarian intervention and that are expected to

    be accessible, i.e., those in the south, would then total 5.4 million2, to which must be added a

    further 2 million internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees3, a part of the estimated

    900,000 destined for Iran and the 50,000 to Saudi Arabia, from Baghdad and the Centre

    Governorates. Accordingly, the total caseload beneficiaries would total 7.4 million. While

    there will requirements that will need to be addressed in the other governorates, as previously

    stated, it is considered that either access will be denied by the warring parties or it will be

    impracticable because of the prevailing security situation.

    19. Given the 21 or 22 days a month that food stuffs are being distributed, approximately

    one million people are entitled to receive their ration on any of those days. It can also be

    assumed that of these 600,000, or 60 percent of the recipients referred to in paragraph 11

    above, will be highly reliant on the ration for their household food requirements.

    Additionally, because the distribution cycle relates to distribution agents, and not to

    individuals, commodities will not be available in certain localities, should the agents

    concerned do not receive their consignments or not be in place. Accordingly, the need will be

    concentrated in these areas rather than evenly distributed throughout the country. Such

    pockets will unfortunately exist in each district and governorate.

    20. The recent trend by the Government of issuing the monthly food basket on a two

    monthly cycle potentially places more food in the household. However, based on anecdotal

    information, the World Food Programme (WFP) believes that the many poor families, and

    therefore with the least food security, are selling the "additional" food received to generate

    income in order to meet their other essential requirements. The current shortage in some

    commodities from the food basket, especially pulses – the main source of protein – also

    mitigates the benefit of the increased issue of food supply. As a result, most household food

    reserves would not last two months if distribution were interrupted or suspended.

    21. Throughout the country, there are some 43,000 Food and Flour agents4, and the monthly

    food distribution is dependent on the present system continuing to function to a high degree of

    efficiency. This institution is immense, and any disruption to its organization would seriously

    hamper the distribution of food, as referred to in paragraph 19 above. Because of the degree

    of dependence of the population as a whole on the monthly distribution of food and other

    necessities, it is not practical to target segments of the community directly when distributing

    foodstuffs. Accordingly, the continued use of food and flour agents is probably the most

    practicable medium for food distribution in the post conflict phase. Preserving what is

    presently there and replacing those portions of the network that suffer during the conflict

    phase, must be accorded high priority.

    22. With regard to the health sector, there will generally be some four months stocks of basic

    pharmaceuticals and medical supplies in the country to meet normal demand. This should not

    be

    2 The 'war affected' population of the 'Southern Governorates'

    3 There will be movement both to and from the southern governorates, which it is assessed will, in

    terms of gross numbers, be equal.

    4 Based on information provided to WFP by the Government.

    14

    read, however, as an indication that there is a full range of medical items available, as there

    are some particular items which are presently in short supply, or non-existent. The expected

    increase in the instances of diarrhoeal disease and respiratory infections resulting from the

    conditions experienced in a post- conflict scenario, for example the absence of potable water

    and contaminated air (e.g., should oil fields be put ablaze, similar to what happened in

    Kuwait), as well as over-crowding, traumatic injuries, and a lack of refrigeration, would

    translate into an increased demand and consumption of medical supplies and drugs, rendering

    the existing stocks inadequate.

    23. It is also likely that in the early stages there will be a large segment of the population

    requiring treatment for traumatic injuries, either directly conflict-induced or from the

    resulting devastation. Given the population outlined earlier, as many as 500,0005 could

    require treatment to a greater or lesser degree as a result of direct or indirect injuries.

    24. The children under 5, pregnant and lactating women, and IDPs will be particularly

    vulnerable because of the likely absence of a functioning primary health care system in a post

    conflict situation. In the centre and south it is estimated that these groups represent a total

    caseload of 5.2 million people 6, 4.2 million under 5, with one million pregnant and lactating

    women, plus a further two million IDPs. Using purely per capita ratios and "poverty and

    environmental patterns", 1.23 million of these will be in the southern governorates, to which

    the United Nations is more likely to have access, and accordingly will need immediate

    humanitarian interventions. This figure requires further refinement in order to take account of

    the infirm, the chronically ill, and the elderly.

    25. Furthermore, the outbreak of diseases in epidemic if not pandemic proportions is very

    likely. Diseases such as cholera and dysentery thrive in the environment, which will prevail

    and as a result of circumstances and the present low vaccination rates for measles, meningitis

    and the like will be ever present. When determining the requirement for pharmaceuticals and

    medical supplies these factors must be considered.

    26. As with other sectors, the requirement for health supplies will vary with time. Although

    some of the initial dependency will reduce with time, for example as conflict-related injuries

    are treated in a particular area, and as some find alternative solutions to satisfy their needs,

    others will become dependent on the system. It is probable that, in the foreseeable future, the

    number of additional beneficiaries will exceed those who may find alternative solutions.

    Accordingly, the need in this area will continue to grow in the short and medium term,

    because of the general environment and the limited alternatives available to the population.

    27. It is estimated that the nutritional status of some 3.03 million7 persons countrywide will

    be dire and that they will require therapeutic feeding. This consists of 2.03 million severely

    and moderately malnourished children under five and one million pregnant and lactating

    women. While not all the vulnerable children identified in paragraph 24 above will require

    therapeutic feeding, all pregnant and lactating women will. Furthermore, using a straight

    population ratio, a little over half a million of the above persons, will be in the southern

    governorates. Among the most vulnerable are the approximately 5,000 persons8 confined to

    institutions, comprising orphaned children, the severely handicapped, and children in

    detention, and 21,000 elderly9. To those figures must be added patients in hospitals – the total

    capacity of hospital beds is almost 27,00010 and although

    5 Based on WHO estimates of direct, 100,000, and indirect, 400,000, casualties.

    6 UNICEF estimate.

    7 UNICEF estimate.

    8 Based on information provided to UNICEF and WFP.

    9 Based on information provided to WFP.

    10 Data provided by the UN Health Sectoral Working Group in Iraq.

    15

    occupancy rates are not known they must be assumed to be high – and prisoners. Although

    the number is not large, the dire circumstances in which they presently exist can only become

    worse and, consequently, their needs critical.

    28. Water treatment requires electric power and as this will, in all probability, be severely

    disrupted by any conflict, it is highly likely that it will remain so for some time. Accordingly,

    the availability of potable water will be at a premium. UNICEF estimates that some 39

    percent of the population will need to be provided with potable water – for a short while – by

    treatment plants that have 'stand-by' electricity generation, although the water supply will be

    rationed. The access to potable water at present is not evenly distributed – 70 percent of urban

    facilities have emergency generation while the percentage in the rural facilities is only 11

    percent.

    29. Given the population affected in the southern governorates – but not including IDPs and

    potential refugees but who have not yet left Iraq – (a total of 5.4 million as indicated in

    paragraph 17 above), the immediate requirement would be to provide access to clean water

    for some 4.07 million people.11 It should also be noted that chemicals required for the

    treatment of water, i.e., chlorine and aluminium sulphate, and other consumables for the

    treatment plants with generation capacity will, in all probability, be limited.

    30. The sanitation system is another matter of serious concern. At present 500,000 metric

    tons of raw effluent are pumped daily into fresh water sources. At present, there are

    approximately 5 million people, 4 million of whom reside in Baghdad12 who have access to a

    sewerage network, relying on pumping stations, which are connected to the electricity grid. It

    is estimated by UNICEF that only 10 percent of these stations have backup generators. Lest

    this become a greater health hazard than it is at present, 5 million persons who are presently

    reliant on a sewerage network would require assistance with sanitation facilities.

    31. As in the case of health care, the dependency will in all probability continue to increase

    and a large proportion of the population is likely to remain dependent on outside assistance

    for an extended period. The rehabilitation of not only the electricity grid but also the water

    distribution network should receive most urgent attention.

    32. During any conflict, and in the immediate phase following it, a significant segment of

    the population will be displaced. The devastation of structures could be great. While in the

    urban areas, shelter will be easier to find through occupation of partially destroyed buildings

    as well as easier availability of make shift building materials, such options will not be

    available to those in rural areas – for the local inhabitants as well as IDPs who have moved

    from the cities and towns into the rural areas – in view of the absence of "makeshift"

    accommodation and recyclable building materials.

    33. In the initial stages of the emergency, access to those in need will be difficult.

    Accordingly while a large proportion of the population will initially be displaced, by the time

    humanitarian access is practicable, many of those displaced will have returned or found

    makeshift accommodation. Under the circumstances, a figure of 25 percent of the "war

    affected" population requiring some form of assistance seems to be realistic, although this

    figure would require further confirmation. Such a figure represents a beneficiary population

    of some 2 million requiring assistance with shelter. The numbers will of course fluctuate as

    more people are displaced and others find or construct semi-permanent housing.

    11 UNICEF estimates.

    12 UNICEF estimates.

    16

    34. The beneficiary population will also present some particular concerns. It is to be

    expected that among those displaced, there will be significant numbers of 'unaccompanied

    minors' and 'female headed households'.

    35. It is estimated that there will eventually be some 900,000 Iraqi refugees requiring

    assistance, of which 100,000 will be in need of immediate assistance13. The number of

    refugees may in fact be much higher, although many of those with the resources and skills to

    resettle elsewhere have already done so. There is also the likelihood of transit camps

    established in Iraq adjacent to borders, with a population of perhaps as many as 500,000

    people.14

    36. The number of refugees presently in Iraq, for which UNHCR is responsible, is

    approximately 130,000 persons15. While these will, in all probability, remain in country,

    perhaps joining those displaced, it is probable that UNHCR will initially be unable to provide

    the support required.

    37. The absence of a mine action programme in the center and south will exacerbate the

    difficulties experienced by the population vis-à-vis mine injuries. There is also presently no

    mine awareness education in the centre and south. While the rural population has acquired

    some knowledge in living in a mine-infested environment, most of the urban population will

    not have the information required.

    38. The areas along the borders with neighbouring countries of Iraq, and some areas around

    the dividing line with the three northern governorates presently under the control of Kurdish

    local authorities, are 'protected' by barrier minefields, and will therefore present a formidable

    hazard to refugees and IDPs. Additionally, the conflict will result in unexploded ordnance

    (UXO) becoming commonplace, particularly in the towns and cities, causing considerable

    casualities.

    Summary of Scenarios

    39. Emergency: The immediate humanitarian interventions are likely to require:

    a) Bridging, material handling and transport16.

    b) Food and necessities for some 5.4 million people 17.

    c) Health supplies to treat injuries for approximately 100,00018.

    d) Health supplies to treat the highly vulnerable for up to 1.23 million19.

    e) Health supplies to cater for the ongoing needs of 5.4 million20.

    f) Nutrition supplies for 0.54 million21.

    g) Water treatment equipment for 5.4 million22.

    h) Chemicals and consumables for 5.4 million23.

    i) Sanitation materials and chemicals24.

    13 UNHCR estimates.

    14 UNHCR estimate.

    15 Based on UNCHR existing case load.

    16 See paragraph 3.

    17 See paragraph 17.

    18 See paragraph 23.

    19 See paragraph 24.

    20 The 'war affected' population of the 'Southern Governorates'.

    21 See paragraph 27.

    22 The 'war affected' population of the 'Southern Governorates'.

    23 The 'war affected' population of the 'Southern Governorates'.

    24 See paragraph 29.

    17

    j) Total range of services for 2 million IDPs, some of whom may well become refugees.

    The number that may eventually be in this category cannot be assessed with any

    confidence.25

    k) Emergency shelter for 1.4 million26.

    l) Family reunion facilities for unaccompanied minors.

    m) Facilities for 100,000 Iraqi refugees in neighbouring countries27.

    n) Mine Action activities, (demining, UXO clearance, mine awareness).

    40. Protracted Humanitarian Requirements : Following the immediate requirements

    referred to in paragraph 39 above, the humanitarian interventions are likely to be required for

    a protracted period of time, certainly longer than one year, and may include:

    a) Further bridging, material handling, and transport28.

    b) Milling and iodizing capacity29.

    c) Food and necessities for, at a minimum, 23 million30.

    d) Health supplies to treat injuries for approximately 0.5 million31.

    e) Health supplies to treat up to 23 million32.

    f) Nutrition items for 3.03 million33.

    g) Water treatment equipment for 18.24 million34.

    h) Chemicals and consumables for 18.24 million35.

    i) Sanitation materials and chemicals36.

    j) Total range of services for 2 million IDPs, some of whom may well become refugees.

    The number that may eventually be in this category cannot be assessed with any

    confidence37.

    k) Emergency shelter for 3.6 million38.

    l) Family reunion facilities for unaccompanied minors.

    m) Facilities for 1.4 million Iraqi refugees, 900,000 entering neighbouring countries and

    500,000 remaining along the border but inside Iraq40.

    n) Initiatives to invigorate the economy.

    o) Livestock and plant production materials.

    p) Mine Action activities, (demining, UXO clearance, mine awareness).

    Socio-economic recovery of Iraq

    41. It is essential that efforts be made as early as is practicable to begin the long process of

    recovery. It would not seem prudent to replace the "state provider" with a "humanitarian

    provider". This will only be possible if alternative coping mechanisms are put in place early

    in order to provide opportunities for employment of one form or other. It will also be critical

    to the success of any humanitarian intervention if the agricultural sector is revived most

    urgently.

    25 See paragraph 17.

    26 Assessed population in the 'southern Governorates' in need of emergency shelter.

    27 See paragraph 35.

    28 See paragraph 5.

    29 Requirement to iodize locally available salt and mill locally available cereals.

    30 Population of the centre and south.

    31 See paragraph 23.

    32 Population of the centre and south.

    33 See paragraph 27.

    34 Population of the centre and south, less the IDPs.

    35 Population of the centre and south, less the IDPs.

    36 See paragraph 29.

    37 See paragraph 17.

    38 Assessed population in the centre and south in need of emergency shelter.

    40 See paragraph 35.

    18

    Debt protection

    42. A key facet of any rejuvenation of the economy will be the continued protection of both

    the public sector and individuals from external debts, variously estimated at between $100

    and $150 billion. This is currently the case under the sanctions regime. Although the relevant

    provisions of Security Council resolutions may be revised or the present restrictions may be

    modified in a post conflict scenario, positive consideration should be given to maintaining –

    at the least during the initial stage – those provisions, which afford the protection necessary in

    order to permit rehabilitation of the economy.

    [remainder of page 10, paragraphs 43-47, withheld]

    19

    United Nations access to programme resources

    48. It may well prove necessary to amend some of the existing Security Council resolutions

    to give the United Nations, including the UN agencies and programmes, authority to continue

    operating under resolution 986 (1995) and subsequent resolutions. They will need the ability

    to access assets on a continuing basis, particularly in the early stages of their humanitarian

    intervention. This appears to be an effective method of meeting this need. However, in the

    short-term, the fundamental position that all assets provided under the programme are owned

    by the Government will need to be maintained, in order not to enter into disputes over

    ownership.

    49. As has been stated earlier, it is assumed that almost from the outset of hostilities, exports

    of oil will cease, at least for some time. As part of the degradation of systems, institutions and

    infrastructure, oil production will stop and, apart from that held in storage in Ceyhan, in

    Turkey, which is very limited (less than one million barrels at present), export of oil and,

    therefore, generation of income available for programme implementation, will halt. Given this

    circumstance, the ability to access the programme assets, be they in cash or in kind currently

    in the delivery pipeline, is imperative until alternative sources of revenue are mobilized.

    Another course of action might be similar to that immediately in the aftermath of the Gulf

    War, where Member States advanced funds on the understanding that they would be

    reimbursed eventually.

    50. Accordingly, the need to obtain guidance from the Security Council and authorization on

    the utilization by the United Nations of programme assets in the pipeline of the oil-for-food

    programme would require urgent consideration.

    [paragraphs 51-52 withheld]

    Relations with and role of the military

    53. The United Nations agencies delivering humanitarian assistance will need to interact

    with the military authorities on the ground. Such interaction will have to occur regardless of

    whether the attack is sanctioned by the Security Council or not, although the circumstances

    will obviously influence the relationship. These contacts should be initiated preferably prior

    to the start of the conflict and should not be confined to issues related with the coordinates of

    the humanitarian operational sites.

    20

    54. For years, as part of the debate over the role of the "post-modern armed forces" the

    military have attempted to carve a niche for themselves in the direct delivery of assistance

    instead of the previous stance of providing logistics and engineering support to humanitarian

    organisations. This is very much an uncharted field that has, a priori, more "cons" than "pros".

    US/DOD is the most proactive military establishment in the prosecution of such role – see the

    extensive utilization of "military/civil affairs" staff in Afghanistan.

    [paragraph 55 withheld]

    Other matters which require early guidance

    56. There are three matters on which early guidance is required, namely:

    a) The likely 'safe havens' in relation to the security phases, coupled with the need to retain

    'critical staff', in locations in the region, but outside Iraq, that are not the designated safe

    havens.

    b) The desire to retain an independent presence in Iraq almost at all cost, notwithstanding

    the fact that phase V may be declared.

    c) The need to be able to access funds for emergency preparedness, despite the fact that no

    emergency for Iraq has been declared.

    d) Although not exclusively humanitarian issue, there is need to give early consideration,

    regarding the role, if any, of the United Nations regarding the post-conflict

    administration.

    e) A last outstanding matter, is the need for the UN to develop, simultaneously with the

    present Contingency Plan, a Plan "B": What would be the UN's role vis-à-vis Iraq if the

    conflict is avoided and sanctions are, at the least, suspended.

    21

    [appendix page 1 withheld]

    22

    TABLE 1 – HUMANITARIAN SCENARIOS

    [missing data and column headings possibly withheld]

    Health § Direct and indirect casualties:

    500,000

    § 5.21 million high vulnerable

    0.10

    1.23

    0.20

    1.86

    0.20

    1.29

    0.83 Based on population of

    children under 5, and

    pregnant and lactating

    women.

    Nutrition § 3.03 million (2.02 million severely

    and moderately wasted under-5

    children; 1 million Pregnant and

    Lactating women requiring

    supplemental food).

    0.54 1.26 1.03 0.19 Based on nutritional

    supplementation required for

    Pregnant and lactating

    women, and for anticipated

    population of acutely

    malnourished children

    under 5.

    Protection

    of the most

    vulnerable

    groups.

    § 5,000 persons confined to

    institutions, comprising orphaned

    children, the severely handicapped,

    children in detention,

    § 21,000 elderly.

    § 0.15 million unaccompanied

    minors.

    § 0.13 existing refugees in Iraq.

    Demining § major threat from UXO to children

    under 18.

    § Refugees at or near borders.

    § IDPs crossing to the three northern

    governorates.

    Shelter and

    Non-Food

    Items

    § 460,000 Refugee-Like IDPs in

    need of shelter and Non Food Items

    § 970,000 IDPs in need of Non Food

    Items

    IDPs expected to use

    buildings and schools for

    shelter. Need for Non Food

    Items, especially heaters and

    cooking facilities.

    Editor's remarks regarding this table:

    The centre 4 columns refer to the 4 areas into which Iraq is divided in this assessment: the

    primarily Shi'ite 'Southern Governorates' (column 3), the 'Central Governorates' and Baghdad

    (columns 4 and 5, although not necessarily in this order) and the 'Northern Governorates', i.e.

    the areas under Kurdish control (column 6). Figures given are millions of civilians affected in

    each area.




















    Press reviews of the material presented herein:

    U.N. officials warned that the impact of a U.S. air and ground invasion in Iraq

    would likely be worse than the humanitarian crisis caused by the Persian Gulf

    War in 1991.

    Washington Post

    Confidential UN planning papers paint a grim picture of the effects of an attack

    against Iraq[...].

    The Times

    The large casualty estimate is predicated on this scenario, which would involve

    far greater loss of life than the narrow bombing campaign conducted in the U.S.-

    led Gulf War in 1991.

    International Herald Tribune

    A confidential report drawn up by the United Nations estimates that an

    American-led invasion would, in addition to those left homeless, put up to 10

    million civilians at risk of disease and hunger.

    Independent

    The BBC UN correspondent says the United Nations has been somewhat

    embarrassed by the revelation of the details of its contingency planning.

    BBC News

    Un rapport confidentiel de l'ONU offre pour la première fois une vision de ce

    que seraient les conséquences humanitaires d'une guerre en Irak.

    Le Monde

    Die UN hatten das Papier geheim gehalten, weil sie mit ihrer Planung für einen

    Krieg vor einem Dilemma stehen. [...] Warten die Vereinten Nationen [...] auf

    den Abschluss der Unmovic-Kontrollmission, wären ihre humanitären Unter-

    Organisationen für dramatische Folgen eines Krieges nicht gerüstet.

    Frankfurter Rundschau

  2. #2
    Richard
    Gast

    Re: Likely Humanitarian Scenarios In Case of US-Led War against Iraq




    BITTE KEINE POLITIK IN DIESEM FORUM!!!


    >Likely

    >Humanitarian Scenarios

    >In Case of

    >US-Led War

    >against Iraq

    >U.N. Classified Draft of December 10th, 2002

    >Ebooked by wintermute_1980

    >2

    >3

    >Table of Contents

    >Notes for Readers

    >Notes for Editors

    >Transcript of 'Likely Humanitarian Scenarios'

    >Introduction

    >Need Assessment

    >Summary of scenarios

    >Socio-economic recovery of Iraq

    >Debt protection

    >United Nations access to programme resources

    >Relations with and role of the military

    >Other matters which require early guidance

    >Appendix

    >Facsimile Files of 'Likely Humanitarian Scenarios'

    >Introduction

    >Need Assessment

    >Summary of scenarios

    >Socio-economic recovery of Iraq

    >Debt protection

    >United Nations access to programme resources

    >Relations with and role of the military

    >Other matters which require early guidance

    >Appendix

    >.................................................. ....................page 5

    >.................................................. ......................page 7

    >.................................................. ......................page 9

    >.................................................. ...........page 12

    >.................................................. ....page 16

    >.....................................page 17

    >.................................................. ...............page 18

    >..............page 19

    >.............................page 19

    >....................page 20

    >.................................................. ........................page 21

    >.................................................. ....................page 23

    >.................................................. ...........page 25

    >.................................................. ....page 29

    >.....................................page 30

    >.................................................. ...............page 31

    >..............page 32

    >.............................page 32

    >....................page 33

    >.................................................. ........................page 34

    >4

    >5

    >I. Notes for readers

    >This "strictly confidential" UN document, dated 10 December 2002,

    >examines "Likely Humanitarian Scenarios" in the event of a war of US-led

    >forces against (and inside) Iraq. It was written to assist with UN

    >contingency planning for safeguarding the wellbeing of a population most

    >of whom the document acknowledges are "highly dependent" upon a

    >Government ration for their basic needs. Since the purpose of such a war

    >would be to oust the current Iraqi government, this would eliminate the

    >fulfilment of such basic needs as food, potable water and health care for

    >most of the population at least in Central and Southern Iraq.

    >The document focuses on the likely outcomes for the infrastructure, the

    >economy and Iraqi civilians, in the event of a range of anticipated military

    >scenarios. It includes the following estimates concerning the humanitarian

    >effects of military action:

    >§ Serious degradation of the electricity sector1, with the knock-on effect

    >that all sectors of the infrastructure, primarily in population centers -

    >including health, water and sanitation - will have reduced capacity and

    >thus insufficient performance (paragraph 5a). The extensive

    >curtailment of access to potable water is anticipated (paragraph 15),

    >so that an estimated "39% of the population will need to be provided

    >with potable water" in the short term (paragraph 28).

    >§ In planning for the numbers that will require medical treatment, "as

    >many as 500,000 could require treatment to a greater or lesser degree

    >as a result of direct or indirect injuries" (paragraph 23). A footnote

    >bases this claim on World Health Organisation estimates of 100,000

    >direct casualties, and 400,000 indirect casualties. The high number of

    >indirect casualties from breakdown of the basic sanitary infrastructure

    >may be partially because "the outbreak of diseases in epidemic if not

    >pandemic proportions is very likely." (paragraph 25). Furthermore, it

    >indicates existing shortages of some medical items, "rendering the

    >existing stocks inadequate" for war-increased demand (paragraph 22),

    >and exacerbated by the "likely absence of a functioning primary health

    >care system in a post-conflict situation" (paragraph 24).

    >§ "It is estimated that the nutritional status of some 3.03 million persons

    >countrywide will be dire and they will require therapeutic feeding. This

    >consists of 2.03 million severely and moderately malnourished children

    >under five and one million pregnant and lactating women." (paragraph

    >27). A footnote identifies this as a United Nations Children's Fund

    >(UNICEF) estimate.

    >§ "It is estimated that there will eventually be some 900,000 Iraqi

    >refugees requiring assistance, of which 100,000 will be in need of

    >1 Including purpose-built BLU-114/B bombs and possibly AGM-154 missiles

    >http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/dumb/blu-114.htm as well as

    >‘Kit-2’ Tomahawk cruise missiles http://www.cdiss.org/tabtechs.htm, as

    >pioneered in the 1991 war against Iraq.

    >6

    >§ immediate assistance." (paragraph 35). A footnote identifies this as an

    >estimate of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees

    >(UNHCR). An estimated 2 million people will require some assistance

    >with shelter (paragraph 33), while for 130,000 existing refugees in

    >Iraq "it is probable that UNHCR will initially be unable to provide the

    >support required" (paragraph 36).

    >The text focuses on humanitarian needs and coping mechanisms. As part

    >of its analysis, the document presents the data of UN agencies on the

    >existing humanitarian situation inside Iraq. The context is the

    >humanitarian situation after 12 years of military and 'dual-use good'2

    >sanctions: a damaged economy and infrastructure, and almost total

    >dependence on the Iraqi government for basic needs provision. The

    >document estimates that 16 million Iraqis3 are completely dependent on

    >the monthly food rations, in that "they have no other means with which to

    >provide for other essential requirements" (paragraph 11). Chronic

    >unemployment since 1991 has resulted in a situation in which "all except

    >the most privileged have completely exhausted their cash assets and have

    >also in most cases disposed of their material assets". For these reasons,

    >the document also rejects comparisons with humanitarian outcomes of

    >both the 2001 Afghanistan and 1991 Gulf conflicts (paragraphs 2, 4 and

    >11).

    >This file presents an analysis of requirements for both emergency and

    >protracted scenarios. Funding issues and relations with the military are

    >also discussed.

    >The existence of this document was first reported in THE TIMES (London)

    >on 23 December 2002, in an article entitled "UN chief issues secret orders

    >for war in Iraq"4. However, this is the first time that the document has

    >been made publicly accessible formatted for print-out.

    >Please note this UN document is a draft. Estimates and other content may

    >have since been revised. Additionally, several paragraphs and tables have

    >been deleted at the request of the individual who released the document,

    >including the entirety of page 35.

    >The UN document was obtained via Nathaniel Hurd, Consultant on UN Iraq

    >policy for the Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) UN Office and the

    >Cambridge NGO CASI (see next page).

    >2 Including all educational goods, most medical supplies, construction materials

    >etc.

    >3 60% of the population, not taking into account that large areas are under

    >Kurdish control and thus a different matter.

    >4 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...522510,00.html

    >5 These deleted parts seem to outline, amongst other things, the 'security

    >phases' referenced to in paragraph 56a and b.

    >7

    >II. Notes for editors:

    >1) A scan of the original UN document (minus deletions) was made

    >available at http://www.casi.org.uk/info/undocs/war021210.pdf, by

    >the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq (CASI) 6, a Cambridge-based

    >NGO which exists to raise awareness to the effects of sanctions on

    >Iraq, and campaigns on humanitarian grounds for the lifting of nonmilitary

    >sanctions.

    >CASI does not support or have ties to the government of Iraq.

    >The document had been acquired by CASI via Nathaniel Hurd7,

    >Consultant on UN Iraq policy for the Mennonite Central Committee

    >(MCC) UN Office. His8 and CASI's9 notes also served as basis for the

    >introductory notes.

    >2) Please note this UN document is a draft. Estimates and other content

    >may have since been revised. Additionally, several paragraphs and

    >tables have been deleted at the request of the individual who released

    >the document, including the entirety of page 3.

    >3) Please note that the document text is the CASI transcription of the

    >original, and as such may contain errors introduced in the transcription

    >process. To be sure of an accurate text, please compare to the original

    >document provided as the facsimiles.

    >4) CASI can be contacted via its website6 or by email on info@casi.org.uk.

    >6 http://www.casi.org.uk

    >7 nathaniel_hurd@hotmail.com

    >8 http://www.casi.org.uk/info/undocs/war021210notes.html

    >9 http://www.casi.org.uk/pr/pr030107undoc.html

    >8

    >9

    >STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL

    >10 December 2002

    >LIKELY HUMANITARIAN SCENARIOS

    >Introduction

    >1. In presenting the present paper it is not presumed that wa[r] is not inevitable. However,

    >for planning purposes, and as requested, certain assumptions are made in preparing for

    >eventualities should hostilities occur. Unlike the progression of the military intervention in

    >1991, a future confrontation is expected to develop beyond the preparatory, and relatively

    >short, aerial bombardment of infrastructure, towns, and cities into potentially a large scale and

    >protracted ground offensive, supported by aerial and conventional bombardment. The

    >resultant devastation would undoubtedly be great. Initially, access to those in need would

    >either be denied by one or other of the protagonists or severely hampered by security or safety

    >concerns. Additionally, logistics, particularly the ability to move with any degree of freedom,

    >will be a major constraint.

    >2. There is a temptation is some quarters to equate the situation following any future military

    >intervention in Iraq, with the population's ability to cope in 1991. Such comparisons are not

    >valid, as the sustentative majority of the population, immediately prior to the events of 1991,

    >were in full employment and had cash and material assets available to them to cope with the

    >crisis. Aside from now not having been gainfully employed for some time, during the

    >intervening period, all except the most privileged have completely exhausted their cash assets

    >and have also in most cases disposed of their material assets. Accordingly, the bulk of the

    >population is now totally dependent on the Government of Iraq for a majority, if not all, of

    >their basic needs and, unlike the situation in 1991, they have no way of coping if they cannot

    >access them: the sanctions regime, if anything, has served to increase dependence on the

    >Government as almost the sole provider.

    >3. There is also the temptation to draw comparisons between the situation in Afghanistan

    >following the military intervention of 2001/2002 and the situation, which is likely to be facing

    >Iraq in a post conflict scenario. Aside from having similar population figures – almost 26

    >million in Afghanistan and approximately 26.5 million in Iraq – such comparisons are simply

    >invalid. The population in Afghanistan is predominantly rural. Furthermore, over time the

    >Afghan population has become used to being less reliant on the state – there has been no allencompassing

    >"state machinery" in Afghanistan – and the Afghans have therefore been more

    >self-reliant. The situation in Iraq, however, has been the reverse: a relatively urbanized

    >population, with the state providing the basic needs of the population as a matter of

    >Government policy. As households have generally become poorer during the course of the

    >sanctions regime, the Iraqi people have become even more reliant on the state to meet their

    >basic needs.

    >4. Furthermore, notwithstanding the sanctions regime, the Iraqi people are relatively

    >sophisticated in their needs. Quite simply, the Iraqi society has become accustomed to a

    >reasonable standard of services that are provided under the auspices of, or directly by, the

    >state. However, with the foreseen degradation of infrastructure in general, and electricity in

    >particular, on which the provision of the services concerned are heavily dependent on, many

    >of these services are not likely to be available following a conflict.

    >5. Accordingly, in assessing the likely humanitarian needs of the Iraqi people during the post

    >conflict situation, the following assumptions would appear to be justified:

    >10

    >a) The electricity network will be seriously degraded because of damage to generating

    >plants and the transmission and distribution networks. The damage to the electricity

    >network will also result in collateral reductions in capacity in all sectors, particularly

    >water and sanitation as well as health.

    >b) The port of Umm Qasr will be largely unavailable as it will in all probability either

    >be blockaded or suffer significant damage in the preliminary stages of any hostilities.

    >Accordingly, it cannot reliably be predicted whether any capacity in the port will be

    >available for humanitarian activities.

    >c) The railway system will be significantly degraded as a result of damage to bridges,

    >culverts and tracks.

    >d) Road transportation vehicles and depots will suffer considerable damage and, as a

    >consequence, there will be a significant degradation of the already poor transportation

    >system.

    >e) As Iraq is trisected by two major river systems which flow north-south and as most, if

    >not all, major bridges will be destroyed or damaged, east-west movement of goods

    >and people will be on a restricted basis. Furthermore, the rivers are of such a depth

    >that fording is not possible and there is an almost total absence of lighters, ferries and

    >the like.

    >f) Damage to the electricity network will result in collateral reductions in capacity in all

    >sectors, particularly water and sanitation as well as health.

    >g) There could be significant damage to existing Government stocks of all commodities.

    >h) The production and export of crude oil as well as production of petroleum products

    >mostly for domestic consumption will have ceased, and the facilities holding existing

    >reserve stocks will have been significantly damaged.

    >11

    >[page 3 withheld]

    >12

    >Needs Assessment

    >11. As stated earlier in paragraph 2 above, there are some 60 per cent of the population – 16

    >million people – highly dependent on the monthly "food basket" – they "consume" all the

    >commodities provided, (by consuming or selling part to mitigate other needs), as they have no

    >other means with which to provide for other essential requirements.

    >12. In the three northern governorates, there will be an immediate need to establish an

    >alternative source of supply for the items provided in the "food basket", for the entire

    >population of about over 3.7 million people: the population in the three northern governorates.

    >Given the probable course of the conflict, the current established delivery system of

    >foodstuffs and necessities from Mosul and Kirkuk is not likely to be available from the outset

    >of hostilities because of their location, south of the dividing line. Of the total population in the

    >three northern governorates, approximately 2.2 million will be highly dependent on the food

    >distribution system.

    >13. The loss of electricity to Dahuk, while having major consequences at the household

    >level, should not immediately impact the provision of humanitarian services. Assuming the

    >level of conflict is low throughout the three northern governorates, and based on the recent

    >UN observations of small and medium sized electricity generators in those governorates, and

    >a 29 MW generators in each of the three governorates, there appears to be sufficient capacity

    >available, supplemented by the delivery pipeline of additional generators under already

    >approved contracts to provide backup electricity supply to "emergency" facilities. This is a

    >factor that will be taken into account when determining the final position of the small and

    >medium generators already made available under the humanitarian programme.

    >14. It will be necessary, however, to establish a supply line for fuel. It is estimated that in the

    >three northern governorates the monthly requirement of fuel1 is approximately 30,000,000 lts.

    >of gasoline, approximately 30,000,000 lts of diesel, about 40,000,000 lts of Kerosene, and

    >about 10,000 tons of cooking gas. However, there is very limited storage capacity in the three

    >northern governorates and the available refining capacity would be insignificant.

    >15. Elsewhere in the country, particularly in the "Centre Region" and "Baghdad", given the

    >likely intensity of any conflict, particularly in the preparatory and initial stages, it is probably

    >that the infrastructure will be severely damaged as a result of aerial and ground bombardment

    >or by the withdrawing Government forces. Infrastructure, particularly that relating to oil

    >production; transport,.i.e., vehicles and depots; ports; railways; roads and bridges; and

    >electricity production can be expected to be especially hard hit. As a result, the availability of

    >potable water is likely to be curtailed extensively. The infrastructure, including private and

    >commercial vehicles, which are still available, may well be allocated by the Government to

    >other than humanitarian purposes. In any event, the logistical aspects of the humanitarian

    >response will require a substantial amount of specialized assets and the absence of such assets

    >in sufficient quantities will probably be a major constraint, until some degree of rehabilitation,

    >albeit of a temporary nature, occurs. Fuel, in the worst case, may have to be imported.

    >1 Based on the latest estimates by the United Nations personnel operating in the three northern

    >governorates.

    >13

    >16. However, it is improbable that the level of services being provided by the Government

    >would cease simultaneously for the total population. Rather, it is probable that there would be

    >a progressive run down and eventual cessation of distribution of commodities and the

    >provision of services. If one presumes that potential military intervention will roll

    >simultaneously from the south and the north, the peripheral governorates of Basrah, Maysan,

    >Thi Qar, Muthana, Najaf, Kerbala, and Qadisiyah in the south and Ninewa and Tameem in the

    >north will be immediately affected.

    >17. The population in immediate need of humanitarian intervention and that are expected to

    >be accessible, i.e., those in the south, would then total 5.4 million2, to which must be added a

    >further 2 million internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees3, a part of the estimated

    >900,000 destined for Iran and the 50,000 to Saudi Arabia, from Baghdad and the Centre

    >Governorates. Accordingly, the total caseload beneficiaries would total 7.4 million. While

    >there will requirements that will need to be addressed in the other governorates, as previously

    >stated, it is considered that either access will be denied by the warring parties or it will be

    >impracticable because of the prevailing security situation.

    >19. Given the 21 or 22 days a month that food stuffs are being distributed, approximately

    >one million people are entitled to receive their ration on any of those days. It can also be

    >assumed that of these 600,000, or 60 percent of the recipients referred to in paragraph 11

    >above, will be highly reliant on the ration for their household food requirements.

    >Additionally, because the distribution cycle relates to distribution agents, and not to

    >individuals, commodities will not be available in certain localities, should the agents

    >concerned do not receive their consignments or not be in place. Accordingly, the need will be

    >concentrated in these areas rather than evenly distributed throughout the country. Such

    >pockets will unfortunately exist in each district and governorate.

    >20. The recent trend by the Government of issuing the monthly food basket on a two

    >monthly cycle potentially places more food in the household. However, based on anecdotal

    >information, the World Food Programme (WFP) believes that the many poor families, and

    >therefore with the least food security, are selling the "additional" food received to generate

    >income in order to meet their other essential requirements. The current shortage in some

    >commodities from the food basket, especially pulses – the main source of protein – also

    >mitigates the benefit of the increased issue of food supply. As a result, most household food

    >reserves would not last two months if distribution were interrupted or suspended.

    >21. Throughout the country, there are some 43,000 Food and Flour agents4, and the monthly

    >food distribution is dependent on the present system continuing to function to a high degree of

    >efficiency. This institution is immense, and any disruption to its organization would seriously

    >hamper the distribution of food, as referred to in paragraph 19 above. Because of the degree

    >of dependence of the population as a whole on the monthly distribution of food and other

    >necessities, it is not practical to target segments of the community directly when distributing

    >foodstuffs. Accordingly, the continued use of food and flour agents is probably the most

    >practicable medium for food distribution in the post conflict phase. Preserving what is

    >presently there and replacing those portions of the network that suffer during the conflict

    >phase, must be accorded high priority.

    >22. With regard to the health sector, there will generally be some four months stocks of basic

    >pharmaceuticals and medical supplies in the country to meet normal demand. This should not

    >be

    >2 The 'war affected' population of the 'Southern Governorates'

    >3 There will be movement both to and from the southern governorates, which it is assessed will, in

    >terms of gross numbers, be equal.

    >4 Based on information provided to WFP by the Government.

    >14

    >read, however, as an indication that there is a full range of medical items available, as there

    >are some particular items which are presently in short supply, or non-existent. The expected

    >increase in the instances of diarrhoeal disease and respiratory infections resulting from the

    >conditions experienced in a post- conflict scenario, for example the absence of potable water

    >and contaminated air (e.g., should oil fields be put ablaze, similar to what happened in

    >Kuwait), as well as over-crowding, traumatic injuries, and a lack of refrigeration, would

    >translate into an increased demand and consumption of medical supplies and drugs, rendering

    >the existing stocks inadequate.

    >23. It is also likely that in the early stages there will be a large segment of the population

    >requiring treatment for traumatic injuries, either directly conflict-induced or from the

    >resulting devastation. Given the population outlined earlier, as many as 500,0005 could

    >require treatment to a greater or lesser degree as a result of direct or indirect injuries.

    >24. The children under 5, pregnant and lactating women, and IDPs will be particularly

    >vulnerable because of the likely absence of a functioning primary health care system in a post

    >conflict situation. In the centre and south it is estimated that these groups represent a total

    >caseload of 5.2 million people 6, 4.2 million under 5, with one million pregnant and lactating

    >women, plus a further two million IDPs. Using purely per capita ratios and "poverty and

    >environmental patterns", 1.23 million of these will be in the southern governorates, to which

    >the United Nations is more likely to have access, and accordingly will need immediate

    >humanitarian interventions. This figure requires further refinement in order to take account of

    >the infirm, the chronically ill, and the elderly.

    >25. Furthermore, the outbreak of diseases in epidemic if not pandemic proportions is very

    >likely. Diseases such as cholera and dysentery thrive in the environment, which will prevail

    >and as a result of circumstances and the present low vaccination rates for measles, meningitis

    >and the like will be ever present. When determining the requirement for pharmaceuticals and

    >medical supplies these factors must be considered.

    >26. As with other sectors, the requirement for health supplies will vary with time. Although

    >some of the initial dependency will reduce with time, for example as conflict-related injuries

    >are treated in a particular area, and as some find alternative solutions to satisfy their needs,

    >others will become dependent on the system. It is probable that, in the foreseeable future, the

    >number of additional beneficiaries will exceed those who may find alternative solutions.

    >Accordingly, the need in this area will continue to grow in the short and medium term,

    >because of the general environment and the limited alternatives available to the population.

    >27. It is estimated that the nutritional status of some 3.03 million7 persons countrywide will

    >be dire and that they will require therapeutic feeding. This consists of 2.03 million severely

    >and moderately malnourished children under five and one million pregnant and lactating

    >women. While not all the vulnerable children identified in paragraph 24 above will require

    >therapeutic feeding, all pregnant and lactating women will. Furthermore, using a straight

    >population ratio, a little over half a million of the above persons, will be in the southern

    >governorates. Among the most vulnerable are the approximately 5,000 persons8 confined to

    >institutions, comprising orphaned children, the severely handicapped, and children in

    >detention, and 21,000 elderly9. To those figures must be added patients in hospitals – the total

    >capacity of hospital beds is almost 27,00010 and although

    >5 Based on WHO estimates of direct, 100,000, and indirect, 400,000, casualties.

    >6 UNICEF estimate.

    >7 UNICEF estimate.

    >8 Based on information provided to UNICEF and WFP.

    >9 Based on information provided to WFP.

    >10 Data provided by the UN Health Sectoral Working Group in Iraq.

    >15

    >occupancy rates are not known they must be assumed to be high – and prisoners. Although

    >the number is not large, the dire circumstances in which they presently exist can only become

    >worse and, consequently, their needs critical.

    >28. Water treatment requires electric power and as this will, in all probability, be severely

    >disrupted by any conflict, it is highly likely that it will remain so for some time. Accordingly,

    >the availability of potable water will be at a premium. UNICEF estimates that some 39

    >percent of the population will need to be provided with potable water – for a short while – by

    >treatment plants that have 'stand-by' electricity generation, although the water supply will be

    >rationed. The access to potable water at present is not evenly distributed – 70 percent of urban

    >facilities have emergency generation while the percentage in the rural facilities is only 11

    >percent.

    >29. Given the population affected in the southern governorates – but not including IDPs and

    >potential refugees but who have not yet left Iraq – (a total of 5.4 million as indicated in

    >paragraph 17 above), the immediate requirement would be to provide access to clean water

    >for some 4.07 million people.11 It should also be noted that chemicals required for the

    >treatment of water, i.e., chlorine and aluminium sulphate, and other consumables for the

    >treatment plants with generation capacity will, in all probability, be limited.

    >30. The sanitation system is another matter of serious concern. At present 500,000 metric

    >tons of raw effluent are pumped daily into fresh water sources. At present, there are

    >approximately 5 million people, 4 million of whom reside in Baghdad12 who have access to a

    >sewerage network, relying on pumping stations, which are connected to the electricity grid. It

    >is estimated by UNICEF that only 10 percent of these stations have backup generators. Lest

    >this become a greater health hazard than it is at present, 5 million persons who are presently

    >reliant on a sewerage network would require assistance with sanitation facilities.

    >31. As in the case of health care, the dependency will in all probability continue to increase

    >and a large proportion of the population is likely to remain dependent on outside assistance

    >for an extended period. The rehabilitation of not only the electricity grid but also the water

    >distribution network should receive most urgent attention.

    >32. During any conflict, and in the immediate phase following it, a significant segment of

    >the population will be displaced. The devastation of structures could be great. While in the

    >urban areas, shelter will be easier to find through occupation of partially destroyed buildings

    >as well as easier availability of make shift building materials, such options will not be

    >available to those in rural areas – for the local inhabitants as well as IDPs who have moved

    >from the cities and towns into the rural areas – in view of the absence of "makeshift"

    >accommodation and recyclable building materials.

    >33. In the initial stages of the emergency, access to those in need will be difficult.

    >Accordingly while a large proportion of the population will initially be displaced, by the time

    >humanitarian access is practicable, many of those displaced will have returned or found

    >makeshift accommodation. Under the circumstances, a figure of 25 percent of the "war

    >affected" population requiring some form of assistance seems to be realistic, although this

    >figure would require further confirmation. Such a figure represents a beneficiary population

    >of some 2 million requiring assistance with shelter. The numbers will of course fluctuate as

    >more people are displaced and others find or construct semi-permanent housing.

    >11 UNICEF estimates.

    >12 UNICEF estimates.

    >16

    >34. The beneficiary population will also present some particular concerns. It is to be

    >expected that among those displaced, there will be significant numbers of 'unaccompanied

    >minors' and 'female headed households'.

    >35. It is estimated that there will eventually be some 900,000 Iraqi refugees requiring

    >assistance, of which 100,000 will be in need of immediate assistance13. The number of

    >refugees may in fact be much higher, although many of those with the resources and skills to

    >resettle elsewhere have already done so. There is also the likelihood of transit camps

    >established in Iraq adjacent to borders, with a population of perhaps as many as 500,000

    >people.14

    >36. The number of refugees presently in Iraq, for which UNHCR is responsible, is

    >approximately 130,000 persons15. While these will, in all probability, remain in country,

    >perhaps joining those displaced, it is probable that UNHCR will initially be unable to provide

    >the support required.

    >37. The absence of a mine action programme in the center and south will exacerbate the

    >difficulties experienced by the population vis-à-vis mine injuries. There is also presently no

    >mine awareness education in the centre and south. While the rural population has acquired

    >some knowledge in living in a mine-infested environment, most of the urban population will

    >not have the information required.

    >38. The areas along the borders with neighbouring countries of Iraq, and some areas around

    >the dividing line with the three northern governorates presently under the control of Kurdish

    >local authorities, are 'protected' by barrier minefields, and will therefore present a formidable

    >hazard to refugees and IDPs. Additionally, the conflict will result in unexploded ordnance

    >(UXO) becoming commonplace, particularly in the towns and cities, causing considerable

    >casualities.

    >Summary of Scenarios

    >39. Emergency: The immediate humanitarian interventions are likely to require:

    >a) Bridging, material handling and transport16.

    >b) Food and necessities for some 5.4 million people 17.

    >c) Health supplies to treat injuries for approximately 100,00018.

    >d) Health supplies to treat the highly vulnerable for up to 1.23 million19.

    >e) Health supplies to cater for the ongoing needs of 5.4 million20.

    >f) Nutrition supplies for 0.54 million21.

    >g) Water treatment equipment for 5.4 million22.

    >h) Chemicals and consumables for 5.4 million23.

    >i) Sanitation materials and chemicals24.

    >13 UNHCR estimates.

    >14 UNHCR estimate.

    >15 Based on UNCHR existing case load.

    >16 See paragraph 3.

    >17 See paragraph 17.

    >18 See paragraph 23.

    >19 See paragraph 24.

    >20 The 'war affected' population of the 'Southern Governorates'.

    >21 See paragraph 27.

    >22 The 'war affected' population of the 'Southern Governorates'.

    >23 The 'war affected' population of the 'Southern Governorates'.

    >24 See paragraph 29.

    >17

    >j) Total range of services for 2 million IDPs, some of whom may well become refugees.

    >The number that may eventually be in this category cannot be assessed with any

    >confidence.25

    >k) Emergency shelter for 1.4 million26.

    >l) Family reunion facilities for unaccompanied minors.

    >m) Facilities for 100,000 Iraqi refugees in neighbouring countries27.

    >n) Mine Action activities, (demining, UXO clearance, mine awareness).

    >40. Protracted Humanitarian Requirements : Following the immediate requirements

    >referred to in paragraph 39 above, the humanitarian interventions are likely to be required for

    >a protracted period of time, certainly longer than one year, and may include:

    >a) Further bridging, material handling, and transport28.

    >b) Milling and iodizing capacity29.

    >c) Food and necessities for, at a minimum, 23 million30.

    >d) Health supplies to treat injuries for approximately 0.5 million31.

    >e) Health supplies to treat up to 23 million32.

    >f) Nutrition items for 3.03 million33.

    >g) Water treatment equipment for 18.24 million34.

    >h) Chemicals and consumables for 18.24 million35.

    >i) Sanitation materials and chemicals36.

    >j) Total range of services for 2 million IDPs, some of whom may well become refugees.

    >The number that may eventually be in this category cannot be assessed with any

    >confidence37.

    >k) Emergency shelter for 3.6 million38.

    >l) Family reunion facilities for unaccompanied minors.

    >m) Facilities for 1.4 million Iraqi refugees, 900,000 entering neighbouring countries and

    >500,000 remaining along the border but inside Iraq40.

    >n) Initiatives to invigorate the economy.

    >o) Livestock and plant production materials.

    >p) Mine Action activities, (demining, UXO clearance, mine awareness).

    >Socio-economic recovery of Iraq

    >41. It is essential that efforts be made as early as is practicable to begin the long process of

    >recovery. It would not seem prudent to replace the "state provider" with a "humanitarian

    >provider". This will only be possible if alternative coping mechanisms are put in place early

    >in order to provide opportunities for employment of one form or other. It will also be critical

    >to the success of any humanitarian intervention if the agricultural sector is revived most

    >urgently.

    >25 See paragraph 17.

    >26 Assessed population in the 'southern Governorates' in need of emergency shelter.

    >27 See paragraph 35.

    >28 See paragraph 5.

    >29 Requirement to iodize locally available salt and mill locally available cereals.

    >30 Population of the centre and south.

    >31 See paragraph 23.

    >32 Population of the centre and south.

    >33 See paragraph 27.

    >34 Population of the centre and south, less the IDPs.

    >35 Population of the centre and south, less the IDPs.

    >36 See paragraph 29.

    >37 See paragraph 17.

    >38 Assessed population in the centre and south in need of emergency shelter.

    >40 See paragraph 35.

    >18

    >Debt protection

    >42. A key facet of any rejuvenation of the economy will be the continued protection of both

    >the public sector and individuals from external debts, variously estimated at between $100

    >and $150 billion. This is currently the case under the sanctions regime. Although the relevant

    >provisions of Security Council resolutions may be revised or the present restrictions may be

    >modified in a post conflict scenario, positive consideration should be given to maintaining –

    >at the least during the initial stage – those provisions, which afford the protection necessary in

    >order to permit rehabilitation of the economy.

    >[remainder of page 10, paragraphs 43-47, withheld]

    >19

    >United Nations access to programme resources

    >48. It may well prove necessary to amend some of the existing Security Council resolutions

    >to give the United Nations, including the UN agencies and programmes, authority to continue

    >operating under resolution 986 (1995) and subsequent resolutions. They will need the ability

    >to access assets on a continuing basis, particularly in the early stages of their humanitarian

    >intervention. This appears to be an effective method of meeting this need. However, in the

    >short-term, the fundamental position that all assets provided under the programme are owned

    >by the Government will need to be maintained, in order not to enter into disputes over

    >ownership.

    >49. As has been stated earlier, it is assumed that almost from the outset of hostilities, exports

    >of oil will cease, at least for some time. As part of the degradation of systems, institutions and

    >infrastructure, oil production will stop and, apart from that held in storage in Ceyhan, in

    >Turkey, which is very limited (less than one million barrels at present), export of oil and,

    >therefore, generation of income available for programme implementation, will halt. Given this

    >circumstance, the ability to access the programme assets, be they in cash or in kind currently

    >in the delivery pipeline, is imperative until alternative sources of revenue are mobilized.

    >Another course of action might be similar to that immediately in the aftermath of the Gulf

    >War, where Member States advanced funds on the understanding that they would be

    >reimbursed eventually.

    >50. Accordingly, the need to obtain guidance from the Security Council and authorization on

    >the utilization by the United Nations of programme assets in the pipeline of the oil-for-food

    >programme would require urgent consideration.

    >[paragraphs 51-52 withheld]

    >Relations with and role of the military

    >53. The United Nations agencies delivering humanitarian assistance will need to interact

    >with the military authorities on the ground. Such interaction will have to occur regardless of

    >whether the attack is sanctioned by the Security Council or not, although the circumstances

    >will obviously influence the relationship. These contacts should be initiated preferably prior

    >to the start of the conflict and should not be confined to issues related with the coordinates of

    >the humanitarian operational sites.

    >20

    >54. For years, as part of the debate over the role of the "post-modern armed forces" the

    >military have attempted to carve a niche for themselves in the direct delivery of assistance

    >instead of the previous stance of providing logistics and engineering support to humanitarian

    >organisations. This is very much an uncharted field that has, a priori, more "cons" than "pros".

    >US/DOD is the most proactive military establishment in the prosecution of such role – see the

    >extensive utilization of "military/civil affairs" staff in Afghanistan.

    >[paragraph 55 withheld]

    >Other matters which require early guidance

    >56. There are three matters on which early guidance is required, namely:

    >a) The likely 'safe havens' in relation to the security phases, coupled with the need to retain

    >'critical staff', in locations in the region, but outside Iraq, that are not the designated safe

    >havens.

    >b) The desire to retain an independent presence in Iraq almost at all cost, notwithstanding

    >the fact that phase V may be declared.

    >c) The need to be able to access funds for emergency preparedness, despite the fact that no

    >emergency for Iraq has been declared.

    >d) Although not exclusively humanitarian issue, there is need to give early consideration,

    >regarding the role, if any, of the United Nations regarding the post-conflict

    >administration.

    >e) A last outstanding matter, is the need for the UN to develop, simultaneously with the

    >present Contingency Plan, a Plan "B": What would be the UN's role vis-à-vis Iraq if the

    >conflict is avoided and sanctions are, at the least, suspended.

    >21

    >[appendix page 1 withheld]

    >22

    >TABLE 1 – HUMANITARIAN SCENARIOS

    >[missing data and column headings possibly withheld]

    >Health § Direct and indirect casualties:

    >500,000

    >§ 5.21 million high vulnerable

    >0.10

    >1.23

    >0.20

    >1.86

    >0.20

    >1.29

    >0.83 Based on population of

    >children under 5, and

    >pregnant and lactating

    >women.

    >Nutrition § 3.03 million (2.02 million severely

    >and moderately wasted under-5

    >children; 1 million Pregnant and

    >Lactating women requiring

    >supplemental food).

    >0.54 1.26 1.03 0.19 Based on nutritional

    >supplementation required for

    >Pregnant and lactating

    >women, and for anticipated

    >population of acutely

    >malnourished children

    >under 5.

    >Protection

    >of the most

    >vulnerable

    >groups.

    >§ 5,000 persons confined to

    >institutions, comprising orphaned

    >children, the severely handicapped,

    >children in detention,

    >§ 21,000 elderly.

    >§ 0.15 million unaccompanied

    >minors.

    >§ 0.13 existing refugees in Iraq.

    >Demining § major threat from UXO to children

    >under 18.

    >§ Refugees at or near borders.

    >§ IDPs crossing to the three northern

    >governorates.

    >Shelter and

    >Non-Food

    >Items

    >§ 460,000 Refugee-Like IDPs in

    >need of shelter and Non Food Items

    >§ 970,000 IDPs in need of Non Food

    >Items

    >IDPs expected to use

    >buildings and schools for

    >shelter. Need for Non Food

    >Items, especially heaters and

    >cooking facilities.

    >Editor's remarks regarding this table:

    >The centre 4 columns refer to the 4 areas into which Iraq is divided in this assessment: the

    >primarily Shi'ite 'Southern Governorates' (column 3), the 'Central Governorates' and Baghdad

    >(columns 4 and 5, although not necessarily in this order) and the 'Northern Governorates', i.e.

    >the areas under Kurdish control (column 6). Figures given are millions of civilians affected in

    >each area.

    >Press reviews of the material presented herein:

    >U.N. officials warned that the impact of a U.S. air and ground invasion in Iraq

    >would likely be worse than the humanitarian crisis caused by the Persian Gulf

    >War in 1991.

    >Washington Post

    >Confidential UN planning papers paint a grim picture of the effects of an attack

    >against Iraq[...].

    >The Times

    >The large casualty estimate is predicated on this scenario, which would involve

    >far greater loss of life than the narrow bombing campaign conducted in the U.S.-

    >led Gulf War in 1991.

    >International Herald Tribune

    >A confidential report drawn up by the United Nations estimates that an

    >American-led invasion would, in addition to those left homeless, put up to 10

    >million civilians at risk of disease and hunger.

    >Independent

    >The BBC UN correspondent says the United Nations has been somewhat

    >embarrassed by the revelation of the details of its contingency planning.

    >BBC News

    >Un rapport confidentiel de l'ONU offre pour la première fois une vision de ce

    >que seraient les conséquences humanitaires d'une guerre en Irak.

    >Le Monde

    >Die UN hatten das Papier geheim gehalten, weil sie mit ihrer Planung für einen

    >Krieg vor einem Dilemma stehen. [...] Warten die Vereinten Nationen [...] auf

    >den Abschluss der Unmovic-Kontrollmission, wären ihre humanitären Unter-

    >Organisationen für dramatische Folgen eines Krieges nicht gerüstet.

    >Frankfurter Rundschau



  3. #3
    Bagi
    Gast

    Aber bitte in Deutsch!


    Ich kann zwar Englisch, habe studiert, usw. ABER ich muss ehrlich sagen, das mir die deutsche Sprache lieber ist. Ich möchte zu diesem Anlass folgendes Zitat anmerken:


    "Die deutsche Sprache ist eine der schönsten und ausdrucksvollsten aller Sprachen - wenn man sich ihrer Kraft bedient!"

    (Klaus Kinski, Ich brauch Liebe, 1991)


    Also wenn Du schon politische Texte hier plazieren willst, dann bitte in Deutsch!


    Grüsse

  4. #4
    Zikadentanz
    Gast

    Keine Politik?


    Warum? Haben Magier keine politische Meinung? Und wenn doch, wo könnte man diese besser erfahren als in einem Magier-Forum? Ist ein thematischer Ausflug in die politische Ecke ein Beinbruch? Stört es die saturnische Disziplin? Oder bist Du einfach uncool? smile

Stichworte

Lesezeichen

Lesezeichen

Berechtigungen

  • Neue Themen erstellen: Nein
  • Themen beantworten: Nein
  • Anhänge hochladen: Nein
  • Beiträge bearbeiten: Nein
Creative Commons Lizenzvertrag
Diese Webseite ist unter einer Creative Commons-Lizenz lizenziert.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48